Are there any issues based on analogy that are agreed upon, other than the issue of prohibiting nabidh?

Most scholars agree on the prohibition of nabidh based on textual evidence, but they do not agree on prohibiting it by analogy to khamr. As for what scholars have agreed upon regarding the establishment of rulings through analogy (qiyas), there are many examples, such as the prohibition of striking one's parents by analogy to uttering "uff" (a word of disrespect), the burning of an orphan's property by analogy to consuming it, the analogy of all carrion to a dead mouse, and all liquids to ghee. As for those who reject qiyas, they establish these rulings through the implication of the discourse (fahwa al-khitab) or the indication of the text (dalalat al-nass).