Is Al-Albani's mention of the existence of weak hadiths in Sahih al-Bukhari correct?

In general, the hadiths in the two Sahih collections (Bukhari and Muslim) are authentic and accepted, with the exception of a few hadiths that were criticized by a number of huffaz (hadith masters), as explained by Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar. He mentioned that the authenticity of some of these criticized hadiths is disputed, and thus they did not receive the same universal acceptance as the majority of the book. Al-Nawawi clarified that the hadiths that some huffaz critiqued in Bukhari and Muslim were either adequately responded to (most of them), or the criticism was based on weak principles and should therefore not be heeded. Accordingly, Sheikh Al-Albani's statement that there are criticized hadiths in the two Sahih collections is correct, but they are few, and the criticism regarding most of them was not universally accepted.