Is it permissible to perform microblading to cover hairless areas after a hair transplant that was not completely successful, knowing that it is a temporary dye for the surface of the skin and does not resemble permanent tattooing?

Microblading pigments only affect the surface of the skin and do not penetrate its deeper layers, and their effect is temporary. Therefore, it does not take the ruling of prohibited tattooing. Rather, it takes the ruling of skin dyeing, which is permissible adornment for women.