Back to search
The question

Is expiation incumbent upon one who swore to her mother-in-law that she would not take money out of her purse to pay, while she did take out the money and gave it to her husband, who then paid, knowing that the one who swore did not intend a vain oath?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummarized from the full answer at Ftawy · imported Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

Your mother-in-law should have responded to your request and fulfilled your oath. If she did not, then an expiation for breaking an oath is incumbent upon you, which is feeding ten poor persons, or clothing them, or freeing a slave. If you cannot find any of these, then fast three days. This is if your oath was intended to obligate her. However, if it was intended as a gesture of honor, then the predominant opinion is that no expiation is required.

Summarized from the full answer at Ftawy · imported

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
119004
Imported
Translation status
Source text, unreviewed
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy