Back to search
The question

What is the ruling on saying: "If I were to disbelieve in God, I would become an atheist," when exposed to the whispers of Satan and without having the intention to disbelieve?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummarized from the full answer at Ftawy · imported Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

The statement is correct in meaning, and there is no harm in saying it, because disbelief (kufr) falls under the general types of atheism (ilhad), which is slandering religion or departing from it, and deviating from the straight path of the Shari'a towards one of the directions of disbelief, or interpreting the essentials of religion to follow desires. The atheist (mulhid) is more general than the zindiq, the hypocrite, and the materialist (dahri); it is the meaning of the disbeliever (kafir) in absolute terms, whether his disbelief was preceded by Islam or not, and whether he openly declared his disbelief or concealed it. It is also advised for those who suffer from obsessive whispers (waswasa) to turn away from them and not to indulge in them.

Summarized from the full answer at Ftawy · imported

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
126233
Imported
Translation status
Source text, unreviewed
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy