Is a channel's description of a large number of Sunni scholars as "Khawarij al-Qa'idiyyah" (sedentary Kharijites), or "takfiris," or "instigators of rebellion" considered misguidance and an embellishment of falsehood in the guise of truth, especially when another channel describes its owner as "the Lion of the Sunnah"? And is the methodology of the Ahl al-Sunnah in dealing with scholars' mistakes one of advising rather than attacking and labeling in this manner? And does this justify the use of al-Jarh wa al-Ta'dil (discrediting and accrediting) to pass judgment on many contemporary scholars in this way, or is it specific to narrators of hadith?